Friday, October 29, 2010
Cockburn vs. Proyect
In his column praising the TEA Party, Alexander Cockburn slags Louis Proyect:
"Who says these days that in the last analysis, the only way to change the status quo and challenge the Money Power of Wall St is to overthrow the government by force? That isn’t some old Trotskyist lag like Louis Proyect, dozing on the dungheap of history like Odysseus’ lice-ridden old hound Argos, woofing with alarm as the shadow of a new idea darkens the threshold."
Proyect responds:
"This is the kindest thing I have heard from a Nation Magazine writer ever since Marc Cooper called me a 'prolific buffoon'. ...
I should add that I spotted Alex’s fulmination not 5 minutes after sending in $25 to the Counterpunch fund-drive."
==
As for myself, I'm taking CounterPunch's appeal (below) in stride. As of day eleven, 605 donors have given a total of $32,500. At this rate, CP should meet or even surpass its goal in three weeks.
"CounterPunch needs your financial support! Either we meet our fundraising goal of $75,000 over the next three weeks or we'll be forced to drastically curtail the operation of our website.That’s the bottom line reality for us, every year. We’re not sitting on big reserves. We operate on a very thin margin."
Instead, I'm more inclined to feed Swans. As I learned from another Louis Proyect post, Swans is also holding a fundraiser for $2,500 (a mere 3.33% of CounterPunch's goal).
Some background on Swans.
Labels:
Cockburn,
CounterPunch,
feuds,
Louis Proyect,
magazines,
philanthropy,
webzines
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Meh. Let them sink.
CP won't sink. But I don't want Swans to drown, so I put my humble contribution in the mail earlier today.
Post a Comment